Consulting
Too many options. No clear next move.Review your process and options to decide what to build, connect or prioritise.
A direction and a prioritised first scope
Discuss a consultationConsulting, better processes, and software built around your team.
Review your process and options to decide what to build, connect or prioritise.
A direction and a prioritised first scope
Discuss a consultationReduce repetitive work, improve handoffs and QA, and help your team adopt the changes.
An improved workflow, checks and team handover
Discuss process improvementBuild your product or custom tool from scope and design through integration, checks and handover.
Working software, agreed checks and handover
Discuss a custom buildYour tool starts with your task. These are examples — we’ll define your workflow, sources and outputs together.
A custom plugin can support manual QA and automation engineers across the testing workflow, with your tools in one place.
Connect approved requirements, code, documentation, issues and existing tests, keeping source references attached.
Review requirements and code statically; examine risks, contradictions, edge cases and possible user journeys.
Draft test cases, checklists, test data and automation proposals in your team’s formats.
Guide manual checks or use available tools to run agreed tests; keep performed checks distinct from proposed ones.
Prepare reviewable defect reports, coverage notes, test artifacts and next actions in one workspace.
Illustrative capabilities. The useful scope depends on your task, available integrations and agreed access.
Turn interviews and research into a sourced brief with contradictions and next questions.

Evidence attached to the conclusion
Agree the outcome, dependencies, scope, timeline and price.
Review working software or audit findings against the agreed scope and checks.
Receive the agreed code, access or recommendations and a team walkthrough.
A clear brief can go straight into development. Audits are optional; ongoing support is agreed separately.
Bring an idea, product or problem. An audit can clarify the next step but is optional.
We agree the outcome, dependencies, timeline and price before work begins.
We agree code, access and ownership up front, document the result and discuss ongoing support separately.
A useful change, built around your team and put into everyday work.
Map the bottleneck. Agree a useful scope and what success looks like.
Create the tool, automation or product. Connect it to your existing systems.
Validate the agreed checks. Set up the team and hand over the work.

Work directly with Olena and Vladyslav, QRely’s founders, from consultation to delivery.
Olena leads QA end to end: strategy, processes, and manual and automated testing.
Vladyslav leads release and AI engineering, and builds, sets up, and customizes products, tools, and automation.

From our product toolkit. One of our ready-made tools, alongside consulting and custom development.
QA expertise inside your AI assistant. We configure OMNIS around your sources, workflow and output formats.
For manual QA and automation engineers.
Review requirements, code and test coverage to find missing checks, prepare tests and investigate defects.
We connect your tools, tailor profiles and templates, verify a real task and hand over the configuration.
We configure work around authorised sources and the assistant’s available tools: context gathering, requirement and code review, edge cases, test materials and data. Running checks depends on the tools and access agreed for your team.
Review DEMO-218: requirements, code changes and existing tests.
Connect the requested behavior to the discussion, implementation and shown assertions.
Revoked cached access must stop on the next request.
Proposes keeping cached access for five minutes.
Cache TTL: 300 seconds. Immediate invalidation is not established.
Active-role and fresh-session denial assertions are present.
The discussion proposes a grace period that conflicts with AC3. Confirm the intended rule before approving the final expectation.
Open product question
The 300-second cache may retain access. Immediate invalidation is not established by this excerpt; runtime behavior needs a check.
A revoked-role check exists. It does not cover the transition in an already cached session.
| Requirement | Shown assertion |
|---|---|
| AC1Active role can read | Assertion foundS1 · S4 |
| AC2Revoked role denied in a fresh session | Assertion foundS1 · S4 |
| AC3Cached access → revoke role → next request denied | Transition check missingS1 · AC3 / S3 / S4 |
Execution: not run
The proposed expectation follows current AC3. The five-minute proposal still needs clarification.
await canAccess(session, document)await revokeRole(revocationActor, user)expect(await canAccess(session, document)).toBe(false)Grounded in S1 · AC3, S3 · cache, and S4 · shown tests.
Inspect the synthetic source excerpts
Revoked cached access must stop on the next request.
AC1: An active role may read a document. AC2: A revoked role may not read in a fresh session. AC3: After cache priming and role revocation, deny the next request in the same session.
Local synthetic excerpts for DEMO-218. No execution evidence is included.Proposes keeping cached access for five minutes.
Proposal: preserve an already cached permission for five minutes after a role changes. This proposal conflicts with the current AC3. Clarification remains open.
Local synthetic excerpts for DEMO-218. No execution evidence is included.Cache TTL: 300 seconds. Immediate invalidation is not established.
const permissionCache = createCache({ ttl: 300 });
async function canAccess(session, document) {
return permissionCache.getOrSet(
[session.id, document.id],
() => readPermission(session.user, document)
);
}
// This excerpt does not establish invalidation on revocation.Local synthetic excerpts for DEMO-218. No execution evidence is included.Active-role and fresh-session denial assertions are present.
test('active role can read', async () => {
const { session, document } = await activeUserFixture();
expect(await canAccess(session, document)).toBe(true);
});
test('revoked role cannot read in a fresh session', async () => {
const { user, document, revocationActor } = await activeUserFixture();
await revokeRole(revocationActor, user);
const freshSession = await newSession(user);
expect(await canAccess(freshSession, document)).toBe(false);
});
// No shown cache-prime → revoke → next-request assertion.Local synthetic excerpts for DEMO-218. No execution evidence is included.Draft the missing check.
Grounded in S1 · AC3, S3 · cache, and S4 · shown tests.
Synthetic users and document; the revocation actor is authorized. No credentials.
{
"task": "DEMO-218",
"user": {
"id": "demo-member",
"role": "active"
},
"revocationActor": {
"id": "demo-admin",
"canRevokeRoles": true
},
"document": {
"id": "demo-document"
},
"session": {
"id": "demo-session",
"userId": "demo-member",
"cachePrimed": true
}
}Automate this check.
Illustrative helper assumptions: activeUserFixture provides an active user, one session, a document and an authorized revocation actor; canAccess returns a boolean; revokeRole completes the authorized role change. Adapt helpers to the real suite.
test('cached access is denied after role revocation', async () => {
const { user, session, document, revocationActor } =
await activeUserFixture();
// Prime the cache with allowed access in this session.
expect(await canAccess(session, document)).toBe(true);
await revokeRole(revocationActor, user);
// AC3: the next request in the same session is denied.
expect(await canAccess(session, document)).toBe(false);
});Source: S1 · AC3, S3 · cache, S4 · existing test style. This adds a transition check alongside the existing AC2 check. No test was run.
Adjust the assumptions to estimate time saved on routine work.
Routine tasks, data entry and handoffs between tools.
That’s about 5.3 eight-hour workdays.
66.7 h today − 20 h after changes − 4 h maintenance
An estimate based on your inputs, not a promised result. Maintenance is included.
Tell us what needs to change and your main constraint. A few sentences or a link is enough.
contact@qrely.infoOlena or Vladyslav will reply to clarify your goal and next step.

