Working plan first
We agree interviews, review points, and what good evidence looks like before the audit begins.
QA maturity audit
Turn release uncertainty into a working plan.
A focused review of testing, release criteria, and responsibility — built for leaders who need a practical next move.
Request a discovery callQRelyExample audit finding
- Release checklist
- Pipeline rules
- Release notes
Finding
Release criteria differ across teams
Next action
Agree a shared criterion and decision owner
You receive
A clear picture of what needs attention in your release process.
- 01Current testing and quality picture
- 02Prioritized map of release risks
- 03Sequenced improvement plan
- 04Findings and review for leaders
Working window
Typically 2–3 weeks, shaped around your release calendar.
- 01
Context
Describe the release process, decisions, constraints, and people involved.
- 02
Evidence
Review agreed process documents and release materials alongside the day-to-day reality.
- 03
Findings
Connect testing gaps to release risk, responsibility, and a practical next action.
Illustrative finding
When release criteria vary, the decision itself becomes the risk.
This sample shows the structure of an audit finding. It is illustrative, not a client outcome.
Example evidence reviewQRely
Release checklist
- Critical user flow checked
- Open defects reviewed
- Decision owner recorded
Pipeline rules
- Build completes
- Automated tests pass
- Critical user flow: not specified
Finding
The checklist and release gate do not use the same criteria
Next action
Agree which checks must block a release and who can approve exceptions
Grounded in evidence, agreed access, and a process your team can see.
Only necessary access
Evidence boundaries are agreed up front. Requests stay limited to the scope you approve.
Direct founder-led review
QRely’s cofounders lead the work and discuss the findings with the people accountable for delivery.